🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.