🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.