🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."