🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers launched a fresh game mode called Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several key adjustments:

• Each team has just 8 human participants, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities done by real players grant full XP, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its title: it's a casual take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides more options for players looking for alternative ways to have fun with the game. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. In other words, a lot of BF6 players are upset.

Player Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your rivals," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. At the same time, in community forums, one user remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," and someone else lists everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this bot mode."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this title 24/7. Let them strike a balance," states a different comment. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," while someone else praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase wait times even longer for different playlists because of the large amount of playlists in the game already. On a similar note, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the current modes. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major complaints is that a previous feature was meant to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate bot farms from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the community meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the devs "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

Should the development team has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to change it again.